Econlib Resources
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures courtesy of the authors. All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.
The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the
earliest-known written appearance of the word
"freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It
is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
|
||||||||
It might be better, but it doesn't sound like much fun ;)
Sure, it might be better for the student in the long run, but the added maturity may take some of the fun out of college.
As someone who will finish his gap year at the end of the summer, I couldn't agree more.
I have learned how to cook chicken and pasta. I have traveled overseas for the first time, to 20 countries in Asia and Europe. I have worked. I have worked on my writing. I have met hundreds of people. Many good skills.
The only downside that I see in the gap year is that it makes the adjustment into college harder. Your peers celebrate newfound independence that you already have been exercising for a year. This is only speculation; I will see in time!
I have a final exam question for "gap year". It involves watching a 4:3 ratio TV show on a widescreen HDTV. Anyone who sets the TV to stretch the picture to fill the screen (or zoom and have the top and bottom cut off) gets it wrong. I have no idea what percentage of young people will get this one wrong. I am confident however, that we could solve Social Security and Medicare by means testing according to getting the question correct. Most people 60 and older are annoyingly stupid on this one.
Arnold,
You stole my idea (or parts of it at least). Obviously, I'm one who agrees with you.
Studying math and philosophy led me to study physics in college. What two subjects are better at teaching one how to think?
A few years ago, I proposed exactly what you suggest at UC Berkeley, where I teach: That the administration make it easy for newly-admitted undergraduates to do a gap year. I wrote a long serious letter to the Chancellor explaining why. My suggestion was brushed aside by an underling: Too difficult for administrators, she said.
My suggestion was brushed aside by an underling: Too difficult for administrators, she said.
Truth is beautiful.
I have a final exam question for "gap year". It involves watching a 4:3 ratio TV show on a widescreen HDTV. Anyone who sets the TV to stretch the picture to fill the screen (or zoom and have the top and bottom cut off) gets it wrong
I have a better test, any consumer display device that is not set up to parse the aspect ratio data automatically for proper display fails.
How about teaching these concepts to your kids continuosly from the beginning. It takes more than year to absorb any significantly meaningful lessons, and de-program the crappy upbringing they have probably already received.
The root cause is a better place to start. The problems of today's youth is a learned behavior. Proactivity always trumps reactivity when dealing with learned behaviors.
Seriously, what kind of terrible parent are you if your college freshman can't do basic tasks of daily life? My 13yo does half of the housework and cooks 2/3rds of the meals. He's itching to learn household repair and get a job. If your 13yo is not like this you are a failure.