Econlib Resources
Subscribe to EconLog
XML (Full articles)RDF (Excerpts) Feedburner (One-click subscriptions) Subscribe by author
Bryan CaplanDavid Henderson Garett Jones More
FAQ
(Instructions and more options)
|
TRACKBACKS (3 to date)
TrackBack URL: http://econlog.econlib.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/678
The author at Economic Investigations in a related article titled News of the World #30 writes:
COMMENTS (4 to date)
Ethan writes:
Gentlemen, Great blog. Wondering if either of you have read Michael Pollan's book, 'The Ominivore's Dilemma'? He has quite a bit to say about the business and history of corn production. Are you aware of any decent economic analysis which offers analysis regarding the history of corn production in the U.S. and effects of agricultural subsidies? Posted April 4, 2007 11:51 PM
Bruce G Charlton writes:
Excellent point! I agree that govt as countervailing power is the lynch-pin of contemporary statism. My sense is that this lies behind the views of a centre-left technocrat like Brad de Long. If this rationale for state intervention is mistaken (as we both think) then this topic merits further examination. For instance in the UK when I was studying (so-called) 'health economics' in the early 1990s, the standard move was to prove that markets didn't exist and wouldn't work in health care, then move onto the real business of strengthening the National Health service centralized command economy through the then-fashionable gimmicks of taget-setting, separate government regulatory bodies, 'internal markets' and quality assurance auditing. Actually, all of these gimmicks are still going strong, as the NHS collapses despite a doubling of funding (in real terms - ie. percentage of GDP ) in less than a decade. But please AK could you say more about this function of the concept of government countervailing power - as I think it is extremely important. Posted April 5, 2007 5:59 AM
jp writes:
I agree with the original post and everything said above. This is a very important topic. Re center-left technocrats: I've often wondered recently why Lucian Bebchuk at Harvard Law School is so upset about high CEO pay. (He wrote Pay without Performance and has been active in pushing reforms.) It has always struck me as a manufactured "crisis." I think that part of what motivates academics like De Long and Bebchuk is the desire not merely to make an intellectual contribution but to have real influence in policy-making. Continually explaining to people why the market, if left alone, will resolve most problems does not feed one's ambition in the same meaty way that authoring new laws and regulatory regimes can. Posted April 5, 2007 9:37 AM
TGGP writes:
I was about to say something, but then I remembered I had already done so just a little while back. Nobody responded then, but if someone else wants to provide support for balance resulting from the countervailing power provided by government, feel free to. [Comment number fixed.--Econlib Ed.] Posted April 5, 2007 5:27 PM
Comments for this entry
have been closed
|
||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||