Arnold Kling  

All Depression, All the Time

PRINT
Outstanding Book, Standout Pri... Depression Economics...

Russ Roberts interviews Amity Shlaes. From the notes:


NRA even ruled out a consumer's picking out best chickens from a batch—just had to take first ones that came to hand. But consumer and business choice are very important. Concept was that middleman gets in the way—historical, medieval, possibly stemming from anti-semitism. Rule was purportedly to decrease inefficiency but haggling and picking matter for chicken business. Rule made market unable to weed out inefficient businesses that provided crummy chickens. Like Al Capone; clean people from Harvard and the Government attack dirty ethnic people. Schechters won, delegation, commerce clause. Communist Drew Pearson mocked the Schechters.

This refers to one of the best chapters in Shlaes' book. It describes how the Roosevelt Administration decided to make an example of a family of kosher butchers who were allegedly not cooperating with the NRA, the Administration's attempt at state-guided corporatist economics. Among other things, the butchers were accused of charging low prices.

The Supreme Court ultimately ruled in favor of the butchers and against he NRA. How is this period remembered? Historians generally talk about how extremely conservative and backward the Court was, in thwarting the "progressive" New Deal.

I am very pleased with all of the new material that is coming out these days concerning the Depression. A few years ago, I proposed a Liberty Fund seminar on the topic, but I had a difficult time coming up with reading materials for the seminar. Now, it would be much easier.


Comments and Sharing


CATEGORIES: Economic History



COMMENTS (4 to date)

They actually jailed a tailor for charging less than the legally mandated amount for pressing suits.

eric writes:

Read Galbraith's The Great Crash: 1929, which for a couple decades was the main source for 'conventional wisdom' on the cause of the Great Depression It makes you wonder how experts could be so misinformed by superficial correlations.

David Thomson writes:

"...clean people from Harvard and the Government attack dirty ethnic people."

"Read Galbraith's The Great Crash: 1929"

Harvard University is a morally and intellectually corrupt institution.
The works of John Kenneth Galbraith and Arthur M. Schlesinger, Jr. are not worthy of respect. The hard science departments of Harvard are excellent. Sadly, the same cannot be said regarding its liberal arts programs.

eric writes:

I meant to imply that Galbraith was fundamentally mistaken...and so interesting from a historical , history of economics perspective, as a reflection of conventional wisdom (which Keynes and the Keynesians themselves loved to criticize).

Comments for this entry have been closed
Return to top