October 11, 2009
Britain's Central Planning Death Panels
October 11, 2009
Free Market M.D.
October 11, 2009
Economies of Scale in Compliance
October 11, 2009
Balan's Challenge
October 10, 2009
The Pleasure of Telling Others What to Do
October 10, 2009
Gonick the Great - and How He Could Have Been Greater
October 9, 2009
More Scott Sumner
October 9, 2009
Not From The Onion
October 9, 2009
Thoughts on a Second Stimulus
The truth is, corporate America is almost as awful at engaging seriously with cost-benefit analyses.
Cost-benefit analysis crashes head-first into the agency problem. People in companies want influence and budget, and that depends on having your projects approved and funded to the greatest extent possible, regardless of their absolute or relative merits.
Of course, corporations are subject to the discipline of the market, while governments are much less so. I'd love to see Patri Friedman's idea of dynamic geography come to pass, where governments are subject to much higher levels of competition than today.
Most of Washington, D.C. would soon be jobless if an executive imposed even a modicum of cost-benefit analysis on their regulations.
I was delighted to see that in this week's issue The Onion also reflects on the topic - using less conventional but nonetheless incisive terminology:
http://www.theonion.com/content/news_briefs/congress_passes_seriously