Arnold Kling  

Internet and Ideology

PRINT
The Height of Brave Interpreta... Leaving the Church of Democrac...

Russ Roberts writes


Seems to me the essence of the web is a decentralized world, a world whether information and power and ideas and solutions don't have to be top-down but are more likely to be bottom-up. It would seem to me that if you're a fan of tagging and social web sites and wikipedia, it's hard to embrace centralized solutions to social problems. But maybe not.

This is in the aftermath of his interview with David Weinberger, an interview which didn't really show off David's energy and wit. I have also puzzled at how someone who "gets" the spontaneous order of the Internet could retain faith in conventional left-wing politics. I wrote about that, using Weinberger as an example, four years ago.

Meanwhile, Peter Klein links to a paper providing an interesting demonstration that property ownership increases pro-market beliefs.

I still have hope that the Internet will foster disillusionment with conventional politics, rather than be a vehicle to mobilize more support for legacy candidates and ideas. On the Internet, you experience something that works well with minimal central control. One would hope to see people become more receptive to the notion of minimal central control as a general principle.


Comments and Sharing


CATEGORIES: Political Economy



COMMENTS (3 to date)
lm writes:

Wow!

"I have also puzzled at how someone who "gets" the spontaneous order of the Internet could retain faith in conventional left-wing politics."

Well maybe by looking at current right wing politics: authoritarian, secretive, anti-science, anti-rational, anti-democratic and arguably anti-American.

Hey, the left may have its excesses but you should open up your eyes to what the current administration is doing to this country.

TGGP writes:

The obviously correct political view to have is plumb-line libertarianism. Being one means never having to say you're sorry.

Mr. Econotarian writes:

There is a reason why Ron Paul is so popular "on the Net"...

Comments for this entry have been closed
Return to top