ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


That poll result is rather remarkable as far as the lack of awareness about nanotechnology among the US public. What the result means to me is that any existing devices constructed using "nanotechnology" have had very little impact on the world at large.
Ravenor
There is a very good chance that you have some nanotechnology in your toothpaste or midnight snack. The PC you sent that post through uses nanotechnology in some of its components. Nano has already made it into our homes, but a big fuss hasn't been made because it's just nanostructured particles and surfaces rather than the self-replicating nano-bots of sci-fi.
This confirms what I've read in public relations research for decades: people don't care about the truth, they care about comfirming their worldviews.