Econlib Resources
Subscribe to EconLog
XML (Full articles)RDF (Excerpts) Feedburner (One-click subscriptions) Subscribe by author
Bryan CaplanDavid Henderson Arnold Kling More
FAQ
(Instructions and more options)
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures courtesy of the authors. All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.
The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the
earliest-known written appearance of the word
"freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It
is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
|
||||||||
Astute observations.
This actually had the feel of an Arnold Kling post.
If you embrace the other party's demons, it's harder to win over converts from their group, and also easier for them to show you as having sympathy for the devil.
Watch to see if this changes in the general election. Right now they're talking to their own respective bases, who already disagree with the other side, because they're trying to win primaries. The benefit to attempting to rebut the other side's arguments doesn't show up until the general election when they're competing for swing voters.
That seems very astute to me. The Dems' demonology seems to be summed up as, "The love of money is the root of all evil," which does seem fairly wise compared to "It is They who are the problem."
This reminds me of a post that Eugene Volokh wrote at the Volokh Conspiracy about the term "witch hunts" (particularly when used about McCarthy.) The most important fact about them is that witches don't actually exist. So when people call something a witch hunt they are implying, in a bit of a roundabout fashion, that whatever is being investigated isn't really happening.
Your use of demonology strikes me as the same thing, that the problems that most people are concerned with don't really exist. It strikes me as a wee bit arrogant for you to argue that anyone who disagrees with you as to whether something is a real threat is acting irrationally, while you stand as a bastion of reason. Isn't it more likely that they differ on values (you noted just yesterday that you have a very different value set than most), analysis, or basic assumptions about human nature?
While we're on the subject of demonology, I'd have to say that libertarians often seem to suffer from a more personal demon. Their unwillingness to take opposing ideas seriously enough. And I say this is as someone who agrees with libertarians on a decent range of issues.
In Democratic demonology, the evil forces are largely domestic.
Although Democrats seem to be overall more upset with foreigners who try to sell us stuff or get jobs, while Republicans are more concerned with foreigners trying to come over here.
I agree that this is an interesting observation, and that we should check to see if the demons are different in other times and places. Bryan's demon is voter idiocy. We should all ask: who is our demon?
"while Republicans are more concerned with foreigners trying to come over here."
And kill us.
And kill us.
I know there are some Republicans who want to keep Mexicans from coming here (I'm not scared of them killing us, but I am wary the impact of their kids), while I haven't heard any propose denying visas to terrorist-producing countries, something like what Lawrence Auster has termed "separationism".