ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


Interesting article, but it had a misleading subtitle. It said workers were moving from the auto industry to its nemesis, health care. Actually the nemesis of Detroit is the UAW--the subtitle would be correct if workers were becoming union organizers not health care workers.
I hadn't seen this in the WSJ, but it isn't surprising. According to OECD numbers, the U.S. spends just over 15% of GDP on healthcare, most of which is funded under a system of guaranteed payment for services, either through government subsidy or private insurance. Odds are that the U.S. will soon nationalize health care (mandated national health insurance) further, and more robustly guaranteeing payment for services. Many people would love to be selling into an industry that guarantees payment for services or goods.
The facts cited in this article tend to support the notion that these workers recognize the guaranteed payment system artifact - similar to the payment guarantee system promised by union affiliation - and tend to gravitate to it.
I wonder how these folks would fare in a true open market system where their revenue was solely dependent on their productivity rather than a guarantee of payment.