Econlib Resources
Subscribe to EconLog
XML (Full articles)RDF (Excerpts) Feedburner (One-click subscriptions) Subscribe by author
Bryan CaplanDavid Henderson Arnold Kling More
FAQ
(Instructions and more options)
|
TRACKBACKS (3 to date)
TrackBack URL: http://econlog.econlib.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/783
The author at Remains of the Day in a related article titled Some random links perused over the holidays writes:
COMMENTS (5 to date)
Russ writes:
Very good intellectual honesty. This kind of thing should be encouraged. I'm not sure why. Posted December 30, 2007 4:26 PM
Peter Schaeffer writes:
“I am certain that no immigration policy under consideration is going to have a big effect on the incomes of the unskilled in America” Really? It sure looks like corporate America doesn’t believe you. The cheap labor lobby seems convinced that the heavens will fall if the United States enforces its immigration laws and removes the illegal alien population. They appear quite convinced that a “guest worker” program is essential to their bottom lines. Save for the La Raza nutcases (Graham, McCain, Martinez, etc.) essentially all of the Republican support for the Amnesty bill came from the cheap labor lobby. Of course, there isn’t that much difference between the La Raza and cheap labor lobbies. Indeed, a significant fraction of the Democratic support for the bill also came from cheap labor Democrats (rather notably Teddy K.). Of course, much of the honorable Democratic opposition (Dorgan, Tester, McCaskill, etc.) was explicitly anti-cheap labor. However, I have a natural experiment that should resolve this question. Let’s have the United States government repatriate the illegals via employer sanctions and interior enforcement. Clearly there is no downside to doing so. At worst, we will have better schools, less gridlock, less crime, lower taxes, cleaner air and water, more natural resources, more affordable housing, fewer social divisions, etc. If you are correct, then America gets all of the upside gains from immigration enforcement and unskilled wages don’t change. If I am correct, wages for unskilled workers rise substantially in addition to the all of the positive changes mentioned above. A few states (Arizona, Oklahoma) have already started the “natural experiment”. So far only positive results have been observed. Let’s make it national. Posted December 30, 2007 5:15 PM
TGGP writes:
That does not mean that we should be assertive, but do not be surprised if our withdrawal ends up increasing rather than decreasing the amount of ugly events that occur in the world. Posted December 30, 2007 6:27 PM
cactus writes:
"No, everything is fine. Our records show that you had the surgery." I remember receiving a bill - apparently, the insurance company had paid for my entire hospital stay but for whatever reason decided I owed them for part of the cost of the epidural applied during my C-section. I quickly spotted three problems with the bill: 1. I hadn't been in the hospitalized at all since obtaining that insurance, 2. I am now and have always been a male and 3. I have yet to reproduce. I'm not sure how the whole issue was resolved between the insurance company and the hospital, but they all decided it was best to leave me out of further discussions once I threatened to sue everyone involved on behalf of my non-existent child. And no, it wasn't a public hospital or government provided insurance. I really wish I had saved that bill. Posted December 30, 2007 8:08 PM
jp writes:
That does not mean that we should be assertive, but do not be surprised if our withdrawal ends up increasing rather than decreasing the amount of ugly events that occur in the world. Good thing I don't live in most of it. That reminds me of a joke. It's OT but I'll post it anyway. I think it comes from a Chris Rock routine. Women never dress warmly enough. And they're always cold. "Oooh, it's chilly." They assume you're going to give them something you're wearing so they won't be cold. The other night I came out of a restaurant with my girlfriend. She said, "Oooh, it's chilly out here." I said, "Yeah! Good thing I got this coat!" Posted December 31, 2007 8:54 AM
Comments for this entry
have been closed
|
||||||||
|
|
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures courtesy of the authors. All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.
The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the
earliest-known written appearance of the word
"freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It
is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
|
||||||||