Bryan Caplan  

Roberts' Rule of Ridicule

Eliezer on the Ur-Mistake... Climate Skeptic Movie...

Here's a gem of ridicule from my colleague Russ Roberts. The National Academy of Sciences reports that divorce is bad for environment, because singles use more resources than couples. Russ exposes this "finding" as a bizarre combination of the obvious and the absurd:

Yes, that's the reason to marry carefully. To make sure you don't use too much water or electricity. Not because it's tough on the kids or yourself to get a divorce. Here's a secret. Don't tell anybody. Living uses electricity and water and it's worth it, most of the time. Here's another secret. Civilization uses electricity and water. I guess we need more people living naked in caves.

If you don't like how much electicity and water we use, explain to me why it's the wrong amount. Then change the prices.

Economists spend a lot of time explaining how prices can solve environmental problems. Russ' post reminds us that we have a far more basic mission: Using economics to explain what things qualify as "problems" in the first place.

Comments and Sharing

COMMENTS (3 to date)
John Doe writes:

Hey, if it gets liberals to oppose divorce . . . .

Jaap Weel writes:

@John: Be careful what you wish for. Presumably households with three or more adults save even more resources. Clearly what the National Academy of Sciences really ought to be calling for is a well-funded propaganda campaign to advocate menages à trois.

Kyle writes:

@Jaap: and if the liberals thought they could find a way to get tax breaks for those participating in the menages à trois I am sure your campaign would be a reality.

Comments for this entry have been closed
Return to top