ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


Computer security guru Bruce Schneier calls this "security theatre." And while lots of us in the industry no longer listen to much he has to say, he still has an excellent knack for explaining things to people that aren't in the field. This is the perfect example.
The single biggest problem with government is that people constantly want government to do things it should not do, and even when the government understands it shouldn't do it (which is more often than you think, but still less often than it ought), the people just plain can't grasp the concept.
So the government does things that don't really matter, because it needs to do something, or the people won't shut up. The difficult part is to crawl through the dog-and-pony show and see what the government is really doing. In general, so long as that inner core is a Good Idea, there's nothing wrong with the dog-and-pony show... but too many people get bound up in the question of whether that inner core is the Right Thing, which is a whole different question.
@Dan
I find your comment odd. As someone who is in this industry I have to disagree with you. Most of us in this in industry listens to what he has to say because most of us cannot articulate the issues as clearly as he can - also he is right most of the time.
At our airport, there are concrete burms lining the sidewalk between the drop-off lane and the doors from the luggage claim area, presumably to prevent a car bomb from ramming the building or something. But, in order to get on a plane, you have to stand in a security line along with a hundred other people. And where is the security line? On a pedestrian bridge right over the drop-off lane.
D'oh!
Hmmm... We can always rationalize though. Maybe those long lines and inconveniences are opportunities to run biometric scans under a variety of conditions.
Not that I necessarily disagree with any of this, but I think it makes sense to point out that the security you see is not as important as the security you don't see... and it's tough to gauge the effectiveness of that security precisely because you don't see it. However, just because you don't see it doesn't mean it isn't there.