ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


I nominate "What did you Learn in School Today" and just ignore the sarcasm. When you listen to the words his dear little boy was learning exactly what he should have been learning.
An excellent musical could be made, I like the second song a lot.
Great stuff. But I think you need to be thinking about a musical or a screenplay. The premise would be a serious libertarian folksinger duo whose ironic lyrics are completely misunderstood by the masses and whose songs become anthems for statists from both major parties (called the "Socialists" and the "Socialites" in the film) as they spend 2 years and $3 Billion running for President.
The duo hatches a plot to maximize their profits, where one singer endorses the Socialists and sings at their campaign events while the other endorses the Socialites and sings at their campaign events. Following a hotly contested election ultimately decided by the Supreme Court, the duo reconciles and reunites, symbolizing how the country does the same and moves forward after the election. Except that the duo netted $250 million from their staged spat.
I would definitely buy the soundtrack.
More Gilbert & Sullivan than folk, but you may enjoy this one.
I guess it's all in the presentation.
Concerning 'profit'. I'd like to see it address it from a different aspect.
For example, a child sees how a well respected entrepreneur contributes to society and really helps people and wonders how he can contribute to society too. In the process learns how the price system signals what it is people want and need.
This comment really belongs on the previous Folk Songs post, but what the hey....
Folk Songs with a political bent are propaganda. A libertarian folk song might propagandize, say, how each party is better off in a mutually-agreed-upon trade. In other words, it would propagandize something you want to do and that's good for you.
You might as well write a song about how you're determined to keep on breathing. Or that declares your commitment to eating every single day.
Propaganda's whole point is to get you to do something stupid, or at least that you aren't likely to do anyway.
I think I'll stick to the Milton Friedman Choir for the moment. ;-)