Econlog Main | Archive Main | Help and FAQ | Search
Specific Archives: Date Archive | Author Archive | Category Archive
« Oil, Inventories, and Bubbles | My Model of the Oil Market | The Under-Principled Life »

ABOUT THIS ARTICLE

Read Comments (2)

Post a Comment

TrackBacks (0)

Categories

More articles by Arnold Kling

SEARCH


Advanced Search

RSS FEEDS

Subscribe to EconLog's news feed:

RDF (Excerpts)
XML (Full articles)

FAQ (What are these RSS feeds all about?)

Register for Econlib's monthly newsletter

May 13, 2008

My Model of the Oil Market


My model of the oil market does not predict a relationship between speculation and inventories. Paul Krugman must have a different model in mind. My guess is that it is a reasonable model, and that he will explain it at some point, perhaps on his blog.

Meanwhile, here is my model.

Think of there being two prices for oil; the forward price, say, for delivery one year from now; and the spot price, for delivery today.

The forward price reflects the market's view of long-term fundamentals in oil production and oil demand. Relative to that, and to other factors such as the interest rate, there is a normal inventory of oil along with a normal spread of the forward price over the spot price. The spot price is bid up to the point where refineries are just willing to hold the normal inventory. If the spot price is unusually low relative the forward price, then they hold above-normal inventories until spot prices rise. If the spot price is unusually high relative to the forward price, then refineries try to unload their inventories while they can get a good price.

In that model, I don't see how the level of inventories relates to the level of prices at all. I only see how it relates to the discrepancy between the spot price and its normal relationship to the forward price.

I assume Krugman has a different model. As to his larger question of whether the price of oil represents a bubble, my behavior shows that I agree with him that it is not. I would not dream of buying put options on oil futures, which says that I do not think that oil is clearly overpriced. However, I do not look at inventory levels as an indicator of whether or not forward prices are a good predictor of spot prices.

Suppose that the forward price of oil were ridiculously high relative to long-term fundamentals. In that case, I would expect refiners to bid the spot price up to ridiculously high levels also, while holding a normal level of inventories.


RETURN TO: Econlog Main | Archives | Top of page

READ MORE: Comments (2) | TrackBacks (0)

CATEGORIES: Finance: stocks, options, etc. (133)


Instructions / Advanced Search


kebko writes:

Here's an article that suggests Exxon's investment decisions imply that they are pricing oil in the long term at $30-$50. Sorry, the point is not linked to references in the article.

http://articles.moneycentral.msn.com/Investing/JubaksJournal/IsExxonMobilsFutureRunningDry.aspx?page=2

Posted May 13, 2008 02:50 PM

Arnold Kling writes:

Kebko,
I saw something like that years ago, and I was livid. It makes me angry that Exxon would not put its money where its mouth is and short the oil futures market. They should drill for oil based on the market price and place their bets in the futures market, not the other way around. I wrote this on my blog when I first saw an article like that.

Posted May 13, 2008 03:40 PM

TRACKBACKS (0 to date)
For MT or Typepad blog authors, the URL to ping (i.e., the Trackback URL for this entry) is
http://econlog.econlib.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/3502

RETURN TO: Econlog Main | Archives | Top of page

READ MORE: Comments (2) | TrackBacks (0)

Post a comment on this article
First time here? See the Instructions.
Before posting a new comment, have you read:











Shortcuts for some browsers: click to make your selection bold click to make your selection italic click to make your selection an indented quote click to add a link More info


(Preview required before posting.)



Clears your Name, Email address, and URL.