Econlib Resources
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures courtesy of the authors. All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.
The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the
earliest-known written appearance of the word
"freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It
is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
|
||||||||
You might be interested in some of Paul Graham's essays, esp. How to be Silicon Valley and Why startups Condense in America. Also a good dose of Joel Kotkin is in order if you've been hanging around Florida for any length of time.
The Michael Palin/Maggie Smith film "A Private Function" is a great way to get a taste of the nonsense that passed for policy in the post-WWII U.K.
My memory of Austerity was going into a sweet [candy] shop, asking for sweets, proferring the payment, and being refused. That was rationing in action, and is about the only episode I can remember from early childhood.
Richard Florida rediscovered what urban economists have been saying for a very long time: There are aglomeration economies. Big deal!
This is hardly conclusive - but I generally find that when you start controlling for inputs (like IQ and personality of individuals, or amount of funding) it gets pretty difficult to find anything left-over that needs explaining - for example in terms of the special synergies of a location. Such factors may well be present, I think they probably are; but it seems surprisingly difficult to demonstrate extra 'added value' derived from clustering.
I took commenter 'sheep nazi's advice and found this excellent essay which I find much more convincing that Florida.
http://www.prospect-magazine.co.uk/article_details.php?id=7072
I was not impressed. Florida strikes me a statistical salesman (I was going to call him an entrepreneur but then realized that's a misnomer), someone who has done some nominal digging around in the data and then tries to make grand statements out of all proportion to what he has found. The truth of the matter is that innovation is done either by a very small group of individual innovators, who are extremely knowledgeable and diligent about their chosen subject, or by people who are able to create groups of lesser innovators that nevertheless benefit from a culture of innovation that is inculcated within the group. Both the innovators and the groups are so rare that they're almost not worth talking about: some magic spark strikes and they arrive or are formed.
Rather, Florida is talking about experimentation, which is what passes for innovation outside that small group of innovators. There is a reasonable amount of experimentation going on at any given time in any given professional community and these people don't have much of an idea why a particular concept will fail or succeed. Twenty ideas or businesses are launched and sometimes one succeeds. The success is falsely lauded as innovative, the rest are ignored. Florida may be right that there is more experimentation going on in areas that are more culturally open but the magic of innovation is so rare that he, and other pontificators like him, cannot possibly grapple with something so quicksilver.
Some critiques of Richard Florida here.
Sorry about the multiple posts, I was getting timeout errors.
[Fixed. Sorry about the timeout errors. Sometimes that happens if a lot of people are trying to post around the same time or if a spammer is trying to post (we hope unsuccessfully).--Econlib Ed.]