October 11, 2009
Britain's Central Planning Death Panels
October 11, 2009
Free Market M.D.
October 11, 2009
Economies of Scale in Compliance
October 11, 2009
Balan's Challenge
October 10, 2009
The Pleasure of Telling Others What to Do
October 10, 2009
Gonick the Great - and How He Could Have Been Greater
October 9, 2009
More Scott Sumner
October 9, 2009
Not From The Onion
October 9, 2009
Thoughts on a Second Stimulus
that's awesome. Thanks. blogged.
What's government doing? How about funding the basic science research that makes rapid technological advances possible? How about funding the training of the scientists?
If you are looking for a "free market" success story, don't look at high technology--90% of the ride is central planning (NSF, NIH, etc). I'm not saying that government involvement was necessary, but it was there in fact.
Very cool. The best part about it: "The company claims that this “Oil 2.0” will not only be renewable but also carbon negative – meaning that the carbon it emits will be less than that sucked from the atmosphere by the raw materials from which it is made." If this is true, then we can stop global warming without having to lose much of our GDP, and we can stop mucking around in the Middle East for oil.
Let's all hope that this goes well and develops further. The article said that a factory about the size of Chicago would be required to meet America's demand for oil. Hopefully they will figure out how to make it more efficient.
Regarding Arnold's point about government, isn't this result exactly the point of gas and carbon taxes? The standard argument for such policies it that they spur innovation and encourage entrepreneurs to develop alternatives like this one.