ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


Unfortunately, we don't have the best selection of people available running for office. We have to settle for the clowns who want to have political power deciding to run and try to fool people into thinking that they want to help others rather than to have power over others.
My definition of democracy:
A system by which wealth is transferred from people who are busy being productive to people who shout the loudest.
I loved Bobos in Paradise when it came out - read it two or three times. But I quite agree about your comments on Bobos.
Except in one respect: children. The main problem of Bobos is not so much that they are excessively indulgent with children, but that they do not have enough children - especially female Bobos.
This means that - in terms of biological fitness - Bobos are a temporary phenomenon. They are non-viable.
Of course Bobos think that they can reproduce conceptually instead of biologically - that they can transmit their intelligence, character and habits by propaganda through formal education and the mass media. However they are wrong about this. Bobo characteristics are mostly genetic.
The Bobos voluntary sterility is something of profound importance, diagnostic of a profound malaise.
For a while, the USA might fill the Bobo reproductive shortfall by importing Bobos from abroad - but at present this is prevented by restictive practices in the professions.
But in the long term the Bobos are a doomed species, and will be replaced by ... well what?
In my opinion, based on demographics, in another generation the David Brooks of the future will be writing about the new Mormon ruling class in the USA.
Overall, this would be a good thing IMHO. But if you don't like the idea of a Mormon elite, there are many much worse alternatives.
Mormon growth comes as much from proselytizing as it does from reproduction. While they recruit aggressively, their retention rates for converts are much lower than comparable religions. And since the vast majority of Mormons in the US follow mainstream reproductive norms, I doubt their birthrate is sufficiently higher than the Bobos to allow a takeover. Independent figures suggest a worldwide membership of 4 million, with about half that in the US. See this Salt Lake Tribune article for more.
If you're looking for a group that shows great potential for reproductive explosion, try the Amish. 250,000 * 6 * 6 * 6 = 54 million :D
Arnold,
Thanks for motivating me to read your review of Brooks's book. Very nice review. One thing you said at the end about confrontation reminded me of one of the best lines one of my students (a U.S. military officer) said:
"The problem with most of those who say 'choose your batttles' is that they are unwilling to choose any battle."
We were discussing this, by the way, not in the context of foreign policy but in the context of interpersonal relations and raising kids.
One nitpick: In the first sentence or two, you say "fine" where in fact you mean "find."
Best,
David
The most important quote regarding presidential politics came from that sage of the 20th century - Douglas Adams, in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy - "Anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job." Which paraphrases the the lesson from one of the Greek philosophers (my apologies - I can't remember which one, Socrates maybe) Those who seek political power are obviously unqualified on moral grounds ... The beauty of our system is that every four years we have the option to throw the rascals out - unfortunately our only option is to replace them with the other set of rascals. By the time a candidate has made it through the primary process they have collected so many cooties from various interest groups that when they do get into office they can either spend all their time making good on all those promises, or they can spend all of their time avoiding the folks they made promises to - one path leads to spiraling deficits the other to stagnation - what we need is an actual alternative. If I was a Democrat, I would be screaming in Howard Dean's face - "How can we be in a dead heat with the least popular president since Herbert Hoover?"(Anyone remember the pictures of Hoovervilles on the National Mall and in Central Park during the the depression?) If I was a Republican I would be screaming at Karl Rove "What happened to the guy that climbed the rubble at Ground Zero and took the bull horn? The world loved that guy - he had better poll numbers than Santa Claus!" The older I get the more disillusioned I become with people in general and politicians in particular.