January 5, 2010
The Economics of the Microsoft Case
January 5, 2010
The Economics of Illegal Drugs
January 5, 2010
Intellectuals and Society
January 5, 2010
Thinking Outside the House
January 5, 2010
FP2P Watch
January 5, 2010
The Books I Wish My Colleagues Would Write
January 4, 2010
Predictably Irrational or Predictably Rational?
January 4, 2010
My Sowell-mate on the Knowledge-Power Discrepancy
January 4, 2010
FP2P Watch


You point out that in spite of troubles in the financial sector the unemployment rate is only 6.1%, which is pretty average. This strikes me as an odd way to estimate the impact of failures in finance on the broader economy.
If the finance sector is partially crippled, my understanding is that this would decrease employment primarily because businesses would have difficulty obtaining loans for good projects. Thus, it seems that the employment rate would be a lagging indicator of the impact of finance problems. Wouldn't it be better to look directly at how these troubles are affecting the availability and price of credit? Or am I missing something?