Library of Economics and Liberty masthead logo
 
Search EconLog
Recent Entries
Browse Archives
by date
by author
by category
Subscribe
About EconLog
Frequently Asked Questions
EconLog FAQ
Econlib Resources
About Econlib
Contact Econlib
Quote of the Day
Birthdays & Commemorations
Frequently Asked Questions
Get Econlib Newsletter
Subscribe to EconLog
XML (Full articles)
RDF (Excerpts)
Feedburner (One-click subscriptions)
More
FAQ (Instructions and more options)
Return to top
Articles EconLog EconTalk Books Encyclopedia Guides Search
Bryan Caplan  
PERMANENT LINK | OCTOBER 9, 2008

Bet Update

Bryan Caplan
See Blindness... Why Do People Keep Calling Tyl...
It looks like I have two takers in the comments: Michael K and Steve Roth.  To seal the deal, I just need you guys to email me and give me enough info so I can identify you "in real life" when it's time to settle up.

I'm also happy to bet Arnold - if he sticks with his probabilities (90% chance of small gain, 10% of enormous loss), he should, because this bet has a binary payoff.  Arnold?

Andy Kessler has not responded to my post or email.  The charitable explanations are that he's too famous to notice my offer, or too rich to find a $100 bet interesting.  Want to help change his mind? (email address from andykessler.com)

P.S. The bets from Steve Roth and Michael Kayatta have been confirmed.

CATEGORIES: Finance: stocks, options, etc.


COMMENTS (4 to date)
Michael Kolczynski writes:

Arnold keeps beating the mathematical expectation drum, even though you're betting even money on a positive or negative. I don't get it.

Posted October 9, 2008 6:56 AM
Grant writes:

Wait a sec... Arnold says something to the effect of:

Put $100 down and roll a d10. On a 1, loose all your money. On a 2 through 10, gain $5.

I wouldn't take that bet. Am I missing something here?

Posted October 9, 2008 9:10 AM
Grant writes:

Eh, never mind, hadn't had my coffee yet...

Posted October 9, 2008 9:38 AM
michael e sullivan writes:

Even though I agree with your position in general (that the bailout is much likely more likely to lose money than gain), I'm on the fence about taking your bet as I think the opportunities for the CBO to declare a gain despite there being a significant loss in real terms that account for all costs are very wide.

If arnold thinks most of the losses happen in a 10% extreme scenario, I don't understand why he wouldn't take your bet.

Posted October 9, 2008 12:32 PM
Comments for this entry have been closed
Return to top
Copyright © 2006-2008
Liberty Fund, Inc.
All Rights Reserved
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures of Bryan Caplan and Arnold Kling courtesy of the authors.
All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.

Liberty Fund logo, amagi symbol
The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the earliest-known written appearance of the word "freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
spacer gif