Econlib Resources
Subscribe to EconLog
XML (Full articles)RDF (Excerpts) Feedburner (One-click subscriptions) Subscribe by author
Bryan CaplanDavid Henderson Garett Jones More
FAQ
(Instructions and more options)
|
TRACKBACKS (1 to date)
TrackBack URL: http://econlog.econlib.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/938
COMMENTS (5 to date)
Frejus writes:
Seems like the attention conservatives and libertarians focus on Fannie and Freddie ignores the systemic problems our financial system faces. Posted October 3, 2008 9:34 AM
spencer writes:
And it was just two years ago that Russ Roberts was arguing that the increase in home ownership was evidence of how living standards were much higher than the other data showed. Posted October 3, 2008 9:54 AM
Jamal writes:
The biggest problems our economic system faces are caused by the government trying to "social engineer" society. It is time we draw a line between what in life is a right and what is a priviledge. And for starters home ownership is a priviledge, not a right! Posted October 4, 2008 10:47 PM
EndMathAbuseNow writes:
Can those who want to blame the CRA and Fannie and Freddie for the mess explain the following: 1) If the CRA were at fault and market's purely efficient, then why were many of the players in trouble (Countrywide, Lehman, Bear, Northern Rock, Hypo) not covered by the CRA. The answer that some of these players may have originated or packaged loans at the behest of a CRA covered institution doesn't fly; in an efficient market they would not retain any of the risk of underpriced CRA loans, even if they were providing origination services for CRA lenders. 2)If Fannie and Freddie were at fault, then why did the big increase in subprime lending occur when the GSE market share was declining? Also explain how the damage was primarly in sectors dominated by private label securities. 3) Explain why in early 2008 the crises in Jumbo loans--too big for the GSEs and by definition not for low income borrowers--was so severe as to generate political pressure to allow GSE and FHA entry into this market. 4) Describe the CRA mandated investments made by banks in the U.K, Iceland, Germany, and the Netherlands. 5) Finally: on some of the failed institutions, please quantify the loan losses from CRA or Housing Goal mandated loans and those from other loans. Posted October 6, 2008 1:39 AM
Dave Two writes:
To what extent did the repeal of the Glass Steagall Act of 1933 - in 1999 have anything to do with the present day meltdown? Posted October 10, 2008 12:16 PM
Comments for this entry
have been closed
|
||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||