ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


They don't know what they're doing, but have to pretend they do, because people really want them to. This is fine when governments are small and inefficient, but the larger they become and the more fine tuned, the worse it gets.
":I have started to refer to the knowledge/power discrepancy. For me, that discrepancy is the essence of the libertarian critique of government intervention."
I agree completely. Hubris rules in govenment.
Do you mean that policymakers specifically lack the knowledge to forecast properly or are you saying that nobody can accurately predict the outcome? If nobody is capable then we simply find ourselves in an unfortunate situation. If our elected officials are not capable then they should be replaced with those who are. I don't believe the example you gave is a strong argument against government action.