BRYAN CAPLAN
May 7, 2013
Keynesian Bets: What's Out There
May 6, 2013
Keynesian Bets Bleg
May 6, 2013
The Pyramid of Macroeconomic Insight and Virtue
May 2, 2013
A Natalist Provision
May 1, 2013
I Was a Teenage Misanthrope
DAVID HENDERSON
May 5, 2013
John Thacker on Vaccinations and the Sequester
May 3, 2013
Chef Rudy's Virtues Project
May 2, 2013
My take on Reinhart and Rogoff
May 1, 2013
Medicare Kills a Program


Arnold,
Based on your post I assume that Masonomists must also see a shift in power from the market to large bureaucratic corporations as adverse. Is it the case that Masonomists are concerned about police power abuse or clumsy bureaucracies or both?
The economic system is an environment, as is the governmental system (each contain teleological organizations within them that partially make up the environment). Thus, to shift from the economy to the government is much like going from the terrestrial environment to the ocean environment. There are ecotones, like the shorelines, where sea lions and penguins do quite well, but the solution to rescuing the cheetah from extinction isn't to throw them all into the ocean.
WHR,
Arnold has mentioned that the suits vs. geeks divide applied to Wall Street financial firms as well as to the GSEs and the Treasury.
Arnold,
Great post. I have used it in a comment on my blog. I think the Masonist position may be just what the current debate needs to hear.
http://learnecon.blogspot.com/2008/10/are-we-in-recession-or-is-capitalism.html
The Masonomist point of view is persuasive. But to make it yet more persuasive it seems to me that no matter how evil or unethical the motives of business may perhaps be, these bad motives are kept in check by competition. With competition, customers can desert businesses that take advantage of them, and go elsewhere.
But government is a monopolist, and disillusioned "customers" of government have no alternative to turn to.
Exhibit A is the U.S. Congress, with a current approval rating of about 10%. Despite an approval rating so dismally low, our Congress faces not the slightest competition from a rival legislative body.
Les,
Government is a broad term that describes many organizations but you seem to mean only the US Federal government. But if its just a question of competition then there is no difference (or little difference) between a private monopoly and a public monopoly. Why focus on government if you simply have a problem with monopoly power?
I bring this up only because I'm interested how Masonists view Coase's and Tiebout's contribution.
He is concerned with it because there is little evidence that monopolies occur naturally, but rather are always government-created entities.