ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax
SHARE
Arnold,
Based on your post I assume that Masonomists must also see a shift in power from the market to large bureaucratic corporations as adverse. Is it the case that Masonomists are concerned about police power abuse or clumsy bureaucracies or both?
The economic system is an environment, as is the governmental system (each contain teleological organizations within them that partially make up the environment). Thus, to shift from the economy to the government is much like going from the terrestrial environment to the ocean environment. There are ecotones, like the shorelines, where sea lions and penguins do quite well, but the solution to rescuing the cheetah from extinction isn't to throw them all into the ocean.
WHR,
Arnold has mentioned that the suits vs. geeks divide applied to Wall Street financial firms as well as to the GSEs and the Treasury.
Arnold,
Great post. I have used it in a comment on my blog. I think the Masonist position may be just what the current debate needs to hear.
http://learnecon.blogspot.com/2008/10/are-we-in-recession-or-is-capitalism.html
The Masonomist point of view is persuasive. But to make it yet more persuasive it seems to me that no matter how evil or unethical the motives of business may perhaps be, these bad motives are kept in check by competition. With competition, customers can desert businesses that take advantage of them, and go elsewhere.
But government is a monopolist, and disillusioned "customers" of government have no alternative to turn to.
Exhibit A is the U.S. Congress, with a current approval rating of about 10%. Despite an approval rating so dismally low, our Congress faces not the slightest competition from a rival legislative body.
Les,
Government is a broad term that describes many organizations but you seem to mean only the US Federal government. But if its just a question of competition then there is no difference (or little difference) between a private monopoly and a public monopoly. Why focus on government if you simply have a problem with monopoly power?
I bring this up only because I'm interested how Masonists view Coase's and Tiebout's contribution.
He is concerned with it because there is little evidence that monopolies occur naturally, but rather are always government-created entities.