October 11, 2009
Britain's Central Planning Death Panels
October 11, 2009
Free Market M.D.
October 11, 2009
Economies of Scale in Compliance
October 11, 2009
Balan's Challenge
October 10, 2009
The Pleasure of Telling Others What to Do
October 10, 2009
Gonick the Great - and How He Could Have Been Greater
October 9, 2009
More Scott Sumner
October 9, 2009
Not From The Onion
October 9, 2009
Thoughts on a Second Stimulus
Bryan,
You say: ""Coasean reasoning only holds perfectly with zero transactions costs. But the Coasean insight that creative bargaining is a very good way to resolve conflict holds even when transactions costs are substantial."
The first claim is clearly correct, and even the more modest claim that Coasean reasoning is insightful when transaction costs are low is easily argued. But your second sentence seems overbroad. You aren't claiming, are you, that prior to Coase no one thought creative bargaining is a very good way to resolve conflicts, even when transaction costs are substantial?
Bryan,
You watch way too much television.
This approach is how I was taught the value of Coase - and I never really got the full value till I started to see that much of the beauty of Coase lies in the fact that he absolutely forces you to acknowledge, then model subsequent behaviour on the fact that the situations he analyses involve joint interests - that's the point of departure.
To me this is a better way of understanding than starting with the notion of "conflict". Mere semantics? Maybe - but I find the heuristic more instructive - and less inclined to bring out the moralistic judge in us.
To Brent Wheeler:
Can you refer me to any written material on this approach to Coase--the joint interests point of departure?
Coasian provision of public goods takes transaction costs into account. I think this is a feature, not a bug, because costs are real and use scarce resources. It should give 'public' entrepreneurs incentives to create ways to lower transaction costs; but does this actually occur?
But I think people take Coase too literally. Without reading him closely, they might come to think that all costs, all transactions costs, are relevant. They are not - and the Coasean fortune cookies if far more applicable than an initial reading of a summary of the idea might indicate. For example, not all externalities are relevant when we are thinking of non-rivalrous goods - so not all parties need to negotiate - only those with extreme preferences.