ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax
SHARE
If you missed me on ABC, you didn't miss much. Out of a 15-minute interview, they used under 15 seconds. Dan Mitchell of Cato did a good job, though, and they used more of that interview.
I understand your experience is the rule, not the exception. The good news would be if the 15 seconds they used did not distort the underlying point of the 15 minutes you gave them.
Thanks, RL. They didn't distort. They used one line: "There's nothing wrong with doing nothing." I do better with local TV, but that shouldn't be surprising. The interviewer, though, John Hendren, was really good. When I would give an answer, he would ask a follow-up question that someone who's thinking about the issue would ask. I find that rare, even on national TV. My past experience is O'Reilly, Jim Lehrer Newshour, and NPR.