ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


Is this even true though? As far as I know any biological father can seek visitation rights, whether of not he was ever legally married to the mother.
Maybe one person in a few thousand has the kind of contrary sentiments needed to reason in that direction. Very nice post.
I'm going to start watching the show.
Sara, I think you're right in general. But from what I understand, the protagonists on the show operate under the law and try to hide from the authorities as much as possible.
I would agree. I think legally Don could request visitation of the children. The issue is that Don and Bill work hard to keep their polygamy hidden for the fear of being socially ostracized and the economic fallout, ie. the effects upon Home Plus (and thus the need for Weber Gaming).
Legally, Don could get visitation in almost any state in the country, as long as he proves parternity.
Realistically the only issue here is Don and Bill's reluctance to face social stigma. And since that stigma would also be applied to the wives in this case, I doubt any of the parties would ever mention it to the judge. Getting visitation would be no problem. The indignant cry of "what kind of world do we live in?" seems pretty weak. We simply don't live in the world the writers have portrayed.
In my personal opinion, the only commality I can see between polygamy and gay marriage is that both are socially stigmatized in the USA. Historically, polygamy would have a far greater claim to legitimancy since it has been practiced and recognized innumerous societies unlike gay marriage. In addition, gay couples can not procreate which makes the claim to marriage weak since child rearing is the primary purpose of marriage as a social construct. All of the other legal aspects of marriage are no different than a business contract/partnership. Obviously, as evidenced by this episode, polygamy doesn't face the same challenge......
Forgot to add.......
In most states, a gay man would be entitled to the same visitation rights for any child they sired. In some of the more progressive states, there is growing legal precedent for granting parental rights to more than just mom and dad. A recent case in Oregon granted rights to a lesbian partner subsequent to the break-up of a civil union even though she was not biologically related to the child involved.