ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


That certainly is gloomy reading. I could be encouraged if I thought the macro mess would improve, but the field faced the same crisis over the same issues in the 1970's (according to O'Driscoll) and has made no progress at all. Until mainstream economists quit deifying Keynes and are willing to consider him just another economist among many, no progress will be made at all.
Sigh. One of the contributing factors to the financial meltdown was the distortion of the housing market. Now the Republicans want to do it once more. You cannot make this stuff up.
Drudge has a link to a Congressional Quarterly article about Judd Gregg, which says he voted to abolish the Commerce Department in 1995.
Gregg’s 1995 votes were cast for the fiscal 1996 budget resolution, a nonbinding blueprint that outlined the GOP’s fiscal priorities after Republicans won full control of Congress for the first time in 40 years.
The Senate version of the controversial measure envisioned spending cuts of more than $960 billion, almost half of it from Medicare and Medicaid. Democratic efforts to amend it were uniformly rebuked by a united GOP majority on the Budget Committee.
It seems economists like Blanchard continue to defend macro by clinging to the notion that their models must mature and progress by fault. Like the wings of Icarus, however, this new Keynesian revolution will ultimately melt in the sun and crash into the sea.