ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


Bryan - Thanks for the read. Unfortunately, Ben has it wrong - the current bill is $800bn spread over a number of years. So, this isn't an apples/apples comparison to the "average yearly stimulus" in Japan. Additionally, that is before we backout the AMT fix.
The number drops by a good deal if you focus on the CBO expected outlay figures and divided by (best guesses) of GDP.
Didn't the "let's make fun by saying 'change we can believe in'" ship sail off long ago?
I liked this post and the linked-to article, but that headline... ugh.
But now resources are being drawn into construction not to meet an irrational demand for housing but to make some long-needed improvements in infrastructure. Would that still qualify as a mis-allocation of resources? I suppose it would be if workers are paid to dig and refill holes, but is that really the case here?
I'm not sure if you alluded to it, but this is horribly depressing because the stimulus package we passed is middling between 3.5% and 8% of the GDPP! I was hoping that maybe all those sneering Democrats were wrong, may be the stimulus could work, but how on Earth can a pork-laden package that doesn't seem to cross the required "threshold" possibly work?