ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax
SHARE
Is "a sensible Keynesian" an oxymoron?
I'm disappointed that the Econolog bloggers have nothing to say (as of yet) about the big "quantitative easing" initiative announced by the Fed yesterday. I can count the lame and incoherent post by Bryan Caplan, above, as "nothing to say". Arnold has been interesting betimes over the past six months. He needs to talk about this, si vous plait.
See the instant effects of Milton's helicopter drop...
http://orderemerges.wordpress.com
I am still thinking through its effects.
Anyone who believes that the paradox of thrift is explained by this: http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/03/vertical_lm_is.html is likely to regard all Keynesian conclusions as a mystery.
What a sensible Keynesian would say:
"I no longer consider myself a Keynesian"
Jay,
one who want's to be taken seriously by people that do not consider Keynesianism to by sensible, perhaps?
Alas, I predict that when we hit 3% inflation, Keynesians in power will not proclaim, "We've done what we can do. The rest is up to the market." I'm not sure whether sensible Keynesians don't get power, or whether power leads sensible Keynesians to hold their tongues or lose their heads.
And what prevents a sensible Keynesian from becoming a moderate Marxist at that 3% mark? If we exhaust our ability to ease the situation by bingeing on cash, we might have to finally think about where we put it and why, not just how much we print. Keynes' make-work predilection for purposes of recovery suggests a means of transfer that brings markets back into balance through the orderly movement of money into the hands of those who will spend it to meet their basic needs. You don't have to anticipate violent revolution to take an interest in healthy distribution.
Now you can all shun the evil economist for being "political". Go ahead. I can take it.:-)
I'm surprised you're not talking about the fact that the Fed just printed up $1 trillion. Whatever the Fed and Treasury may be led by, it's not "sensible Keynesians." Just Keynesians. I'm really looking forward to the massive inflation coming up.