BRYAN CAPLAN
May 7, 2013
Keynesian Bets: What's Out There
May 6, 2013
Keynesian Bets Bleg
May 6, 2013
The Pyramid of Macroeconomic Insight and Virtue
May 2, 2013
A Natalist Provision
May 1, 2013
I Was a Teenage Misanthrope
DAVID HENDERSON
May 5, 2013
John Thacker on Vaccinations and the Sequester
May 3, 2013
Chef Rudy's Virtues Project
May 2, 2013
My take on Reinhart and Rogoff
May 1, 2013
Medicare Kills a Program


Is "a sensible Keynesian" an oxymoron?
I'm disappointed that the Econolog bloggers have nothing to say (as of yet) about the big "quantitative easing" initiative announced by the Fed yesterday. I can count the lame and incoherent post by Bryan Caplan, above, as "nothing to say". Arnold has been interesting betimes over the past six months. He needs to talk about this, si vous plait.
See the instant effects of Milton's helicopter drop...
http://orderemerges.wordpress.com
I am still thinking through its effects.
Anyone who believes that the paradox of thrift is explained by this: http://econlog.econlib.org/archives/2009/03/vertical_lm_is.html is likely to regard all Keynesian conclusions as a mystery.
What a sensible Keynesian would say:
"I no longer consider myself a Keynesian"
Jay,
one who want's to be taken seriously by people that do not consider Keynesianism to by sensible, perhaps?
Alas, I predict that when we hit 3% inflation, Keynesians in power will not proclaim, "We've done what we can do. The rest is up to the market." I'm not sure whether sensible Keynesians don't get power, or whether power leads sensible Keynesians to hold their tongues or lose their heads.
And what prevents a sensible Keynesian from becoming a moderate Marxist at that 3% mark? If we exhaust our ability to ease the situation by bingeing on cash, we might have to finally think about where we put it and why, not just how much we print. Keynes' make-work predilection for purposes of recovery suggests a means of transfer that brings markets back into balance through the orderly movement of money into the hands of those who will spend it to meet their basic needs. You don't have to anticipate violent revolution to take an interest in healthy distribution.
Now you can all shun the evil economist for being "political". Go ahead. I can take it.:-)
I'm surprised you're not talking about the fact that the Fed just printed up $1 trillion. Whatever the Fed and Treasury may be led by, it's not "sensible Keynesians." Just Keynesians. I'm really looking forward to the massive inflation coming up.