ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


That's amusing. (And well transcribed -- I can hear it going down exactly like that.)
At the end of Scott's piece, he says to himself, "It's no crime to be ignorant of economics." But the lawyer's views didn't seem to be all that different from Richard Posner's in his new book, and Posner certainly isn't ignorant of economics (is he?).
Funny thing is both the lawyer and Scott are right. Lawyer, "we're in a rut and going sideways for a long time" -- absolutely true. Scott, "don't bail out the losers" -- or you slideways for a long time.
[Comment removed pending confirmation of email address and for rudeness. Email the webmaster@econlib.org to request restoring your comment privileges.--Econlib Ed.]
This just in:
Lawyer believes in regulation!