ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


Neither asleep-at-the-wheel regulators, not greed caused the crisis. Hubris and bad macro and monetary theory did. The excerpt below is from "The Recession-Causes and Cures" pp 13-14 by David Simpson of the Adam Smith Institute:
"These conditions resulted in a period of disinflation – a slowdown in the rate of
increase of the prices of goods and services.8 Disinflation helped to usher in a
feeling of confidence, first amongst policymakers and later amongst financial market
participants, that a new and permanent era of financial stability and economic
wellbeing had been achieved. It was known to believers as the ‘New Paradigm’.
In his Presidential address to the 2003 meeting of the American Economic
Association, Robert Lucas said that the “central problem of depression prevention
has been solved, for all practical purposes.” A year later, Ben Bernanke, soon to be
appointed to succeed Alan Greenspan as Chairman of the Federal Reserve Board,
gave a speech entitled ‘The Great Moderation’. Like Lucas, he argued that modern
macroeconomic policy had solved the problem of the business cycle, or at least had
reduced it to the point that it was no longer a major concern."
"This orthodox view, which is held by neoclassical monetarists and Keynesians alike,
is unbalanced in two important respects. It does not acknowledge the significance
of the ‘boom’ phase of the boom and bust cycle – indeed, it does not acknowledge
its existence at all. And, secondly, it believes that the ‘bust’ phase is purely the
result of a deficiency of aggregate demand. Nevertheless, it is a view that appeared
to have been vindicated by recent events. The Fed had responded to the financial
crises of 1987, 1991 and 2001 by flooding the financial markets with money,
and the subsequent recessions in real activity were either short-lived or avoided
altogether. These apparently successful policy responses added to the belief that
the Western world had entered a New Paradigm of financial stability and economic
prosperity. They also laid the foundations for later disaster by fixing in the minds
of financial market players the belief that that no matter what you did, the central
bank would bail you out.9"
"It was widely believed by central bankers, Treasury officials and their advisers on
both sides of the Atlantic that this new era of financial stability, low inflation, steady
growth and low unemployment would last forever, not appreciating that it was the
result of transient historical forces that had already begun to disappear by the time
the first tremor was felt in the financial markets in August 2007.10" http://www.adamsmith.org/images/stories/the-recession.pdf
It's ridiculous for the government to blame it on the rating agencies when government regulations gave those 3 rating agencies a bloody monopoly...
When are we going to stop picking on the regulators? They did exactly what we wanted them to do. And stop blaming the ratings agencies too.
Every person who obtained a mortgage in the last 8 years is to blame. Every person who drew on home equity lines of credit is to blame. The regulators, ratings agencies, and everyone else were serving those looting their real estate holdings to buy new cars and take great vacations.