ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


I read the whole thing on the WaPo's website and all I have to say is: Well done. Unfortunately, no one in power in today's mess that is Washington will do anything resembling what you wrote. Instead, they'd rather spend time using the crisis to consolidate even more power and name czar after czar to head some polit bureau-esque agency.
a good summary of events
Believe it or not I agree with you.
Financial panic are inherent to financial market capitalism and seem to be a generational thing of overshoot and changes in mass or mob psychology.
There was a generational shift in the 1980s-90s in favor of deregulation that no one individual or institution would have been able to surmount. I'm old enough that my original training in finance was by people who lived through and remembered the depression. Through the 1970s attitudes were shaped by those who experienced the depression. But that passed from the scene and everyone came to see the lessons learned in the depression as unnecessary restrictions.
It is like one of my favorite bromides from the depression that the most dangerous thing in the world is an intelligent banker.
The overwhelming bulk of comments we see about it is simply Monday morning quarterbacking that has little basis in reality.
I'm not sure you were fair to the proposal to trade CDS on an exchange. I don't think the exchange would have necessarily prevent AIG from taking on so much risk; rather, it would have provided visibility to people what AIG was doing. Of course, you could point out that AIG's partners knew AIG could never cover and were planning on rescue by the government.
I think you're right about the super-regulator never happening.