BRYAN CAPLAN
May 7, 2013
Keynesian Bets: What's Out There
May 6, 2013
Keynesian Bets Bleg
May 6, 2013
The Pyramid of Macroeconomic Insight and Virtue
May 2, 2013
A Natalist Provision
May 1, 2013
I Was a Teenage Misanthrope
DAVID HENDERSON
May 5, 2013
John Thacker on Vaccinations and the Sequester
May 3, 2013
Chef Rudy's Virtues Project
May 2, 2013
My take on Reinhart and Rogoff
May 1, 2013
Medicare Kills a Program


Thanks for the link to arjounals. I started reading “The state of Macro” by Olivier Blanchard. In his conclusion he notes,
“A macroeconomic article today often follows strict, haiku-like rules. It starts from a general equilibrium structure, in which individuals maximize the expected present value of utility, firms maximize their value, and markets clear. Then, it introduces a twist, be it an imperfection or the closing of a particular set of markets, and works out the general equilibrium implications. It then performs a numerical simulation based on calibration, showing that the model performs well. It ends with a welfare assessment.”
I think this nicely highlights the central problem with economics as currently practiced. The assumption of a welfare assessment is a necessary one to be rewarded by the institutions that really care about economics namely the state and the institutions that support the state, special interest groups, lobbyists, universities etc. I think that in a truly free market, the study of economics would look more like philosophy. Financial engineering would fill the gap for math weenies… ; )