ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


I've got money in DBO. I suppose I had better look at selling that off and buying stock in some Canadian oil or natgas companies.
Wondering if "Blame Canada" comes next.
On executive pay ...
Under the spirit and letter of U.S. law, owners (stockholders) of a publicly owned company have the rights to proceeds and the rights to control. If the taxpayers are significant shareholders, as in Citi for example, their elected representatives have every right to control executive compensation scales. Conversely, if the government isn't a shareholder, it should butt out and let the actual shareholders control such matters within a given company, per existing law. I would actually favor the congress-critters snipping the pay of executives of the companies they own significant stakes in - that would effectively kill those companies, which should have died a 'natural' death, prior to the bailout.
On limiting 'speculative trading' in the commodities markets (notably, petroleum) ...
I watched a Senator from Vermont advocate that very thing yesterday on CNBC. His position was that such limits would preclude the "speculative run-up in gas prices that hurts U.S. consumers ..." Funny he didn't mention (nor did any of the commentators ask about) the Federal/State restrictions and limitations on domestic energy production affecting petroleum prices and hurting the U.S. consumer. High prices for a commodity are only detrimental when one is a net buyer of the commodity, not if one is a net producer.
Overall ...
Matt C has the right idea - I've already shifted about 60% of my investment portfolio to Canadian and other foreign producers. The current (and recently past) elected representatives seem to have an insatiable desire to micro-manage every aspect of economic activity. That does not bode well for investment returns in the U.S., given those representative's demonstrated lack of efficiency/effectiveness in managing the fiscal situation that is actually within their legal charter. The massive flow of investment capital out of the U.S. that has been going on for a couple of years, and continues, is a first indication of a government-strangled economy. I suspect that current and future under-subscribed government debt offerings, as happened yesterday, are an additional indicator - and one with far more serious ramifications.
If the taxpayers are significant shareholders, as in Citi for example, their elected representatives have every right to control executive compensation scales.
If the taxpayers are majority shareholders, rather. If they're merely significant shareholders, government representatives can vote in the elections like the other minority shareholders.