October 11, 2009
Britain's Central Planning Death Panels
October 11, 2009
Free Market M.D.
October 11, 2009
Economies of Scale in Compliance
October 11, 2009
Balan's Challenge
October 10, 2009
The Pleasure of Telling Others What to Do
October 10, 2009
Gonick the Great - and How He Could Have Been Greater
October 9, 2009
More Scott Sumner
October 9, 2009
Not From The Onion
October 9, 2009
Thoughts on a Second Stimulus
Tyler,
"...I'm against price controls. But I'm all in favor of budgeting. In fact, I want X to be as low as possible, because when X=0 for all Y, socialized medicine disappears by default."
As does all provision of medical services. See how many MRI's you can get for a buck.
Regards, Don
1. Government pays 50% of all healthcare costs (with taxpayer funds).
2. Government has significant market power.
If government refuses to pay more than X for service Y and they pay less than the market clearing price won't we end up with price controls?
What I meant was "pay for performance." If a doctor checks a box saying that he did X, he gets a bonus. If he says he did Y, he gets a penalty.
In theory, this is brilliant. In practice it will be gamed and lead to perverse results.
In theory, this is brilliant.
In theory this is brilliant only when the consumer of the services is the one who assess the performance. Otherwise, you get a system that is easily gamed or requires a labyrinth of government metrics and still provides incentive for doctors to reject the sickest patients.
http://devilish-details.blogspot.com/2009/08/unintended-consequences-of-paying.html
If the government made X=0 for all Y, where Y=Medicare, we could afford Obama's health care plan.
Let's do it!
The government sets the minimum price via Medicare payments to providers. Private insurers typically pay 10 to 20% more than the government.
JohnnyB: That's not true. There's a lot of regional variation. In Phoenix, private insurers often pay less than Medicare.
[Comment removed pending confirmation of email address. Email the webmaster@econlib.org to request restoring this comment. A valid email address is required to post comments on EconLog.--Econlib Ed.]
I like the way Bryan makes this distinction. I really wish conservatives could get on board with budgeting. Unfortunately, they seem to have made "rationing" into a dirty word, when the best possible thing for the private market is a budgeted (and therefore limited) government plan.
Look at Britain as an example. The government's care is budgeted (£30,000 per QALY, IIRC), and there is a very vibrant private sector.