ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


Arnold:
Along these same lines did you see this article by James V. DeLong titled "Maybe We Should Spend More on Healthcare"?
Here is the link: http://american.com/archive/2009/maybe-we-should-spend-more-on-healthcare
I would enjoy reading your take on it.
I fail to understand the source of that idea that an increase in family income correlates to an increase in willing healthcare expenditures. I would like to investigate that number.
Those with free healthcare spend an inordinate amount of healthcare dollars (that they are not responsible for paying). Many people inthe $50,000 to $150,000 income bracket do not have health insurance because of the cost. These people limit their use of healtchare to control those costs. I do not have any data on those above $150,000 income and their use of healthcare.
On the point of diminishing returns there is no argument. We can't continue to increase healthcare expenditures in excess of capacity. Of course those figures make great graphs for Presidential speeches...
Regarding James DeLong's article, there is too much evidence for Hansonian medicine to make me feel complacent about high levels of health care spending. Of course, if people were spending their own money, I would not care what they did with it.
The link is borked.
Fogel is arguing that healthcare is a 'superior good', which means diminishing returns don't apply. The
Scrivener explains: