Econlib Resources
Subscribe to EconLog
XML (Full articles)RDF (Excerpts) Feedburner (One-click subscriptions) Subscribe by author
Bryan CaplanDavid Henderson Garett Jones More
FAQ
(Instructions and more options)
|
TRACKBACKS (1 to date)
TrackBack URL: http://econlog.econlib.org/mt/mt-tb.cgi/2432
The author at Roth & Company, P.C. in a related article titled How tax preparer regulation tastes like chicken writes:
COMMENTS (9 to date)
Matt C writes:
I have heard old people say that "basic" food simply tasted better in the old days. You can attribute this to old-person crankiness, but I'm inclined to believe it. Sometime you should read In Defense of Food by Michael Pollan. It was better and more interesting than I expected. I particularly enjoyed the story of the Christian libertarian organic farmer (quite a character, and vocal about USDA regs messing up his business in dumb ways). Posted October 11, 2009 1:53 PM
David E writes:
Are you familiar with Joel Salatin? He was one of the main characters in Ominvore's Dilemma, and talks a lot about how the USDA/government limits alternatives to factory farming. From a personal perspective, I have a certain amount of respect for the industrialized farming system that can feed so many people cheaply. I recognize that is something that's only been true for a short period of time in human history, and not something that should be taken for granted. But I strongly believe that factory food is much less nourishing that traditionally grown foods (grass-fed, etc), and that is leading to much of our overeating health issues. Here's a link to Salatin's book Everything I want to do is illegal. Posted October 11, 2009 1:56 PM
Dan Hill writes:
Or as they say, with factory farming everything tastes like chicken. Except chicken! Seriously, whatever my personal food preferences (and I'm well off and fussy enough to willingly pay extra for food that tastes better), the market ought to be left to sort this out, so that every preferred combination of taste and price is accommodated. I would bet, even though I don't know the history of the USDA regulations with respect to chicken farming, that the big chicken firms lobbied (and still lobby) for these regulations, so that the only real choice we have is cheap and tasteless chicken or tasty but illegal chicken... Posted October 11, 2009 2:52 PM
dennis tuchler writes:
The respondent said that she paid a little more for more quality. The USDA is supposed to set a floor on that quality, so that those who can't pay a little more can still get safe poultry. Of course, informing people of the quality differences also costs money, for which those who purchase that information would pay. That still freezes out the poor. So,despite the sordid history of the USDA, I suspect it is still needed to protect those who cannot afford to pay a little more for better stuff or who cannot purchase the information that tells them what to buy. Of course there is the darwinnian/spencerian argument about culling ... Posted October 11, 2009 7:02 PM
greenish writes:
... which neither Darwin nor Spencer would have approved of. Posted October 11, 2009 8:24 PM
Eric H writes:
I'm partial to the cocktail party anecdote on lawnmower safety regs that Bruce Yandle mentions in this Econtalk podcast. The schemes Big Gov and Big Biz will concoct to limit the extent of the market... Posted October 11, 2009 8:35 PM
Matt C writes:
The Michael Pollan book I was thinking of was probably the Omnivore's Dilemma. Thanks David E. Posted October 12, 2009 9:28 AM
Jeremy, Alabama writes:
I've known this for years. Check out New Jersey dairy farming regs. Over several years they instituted various, and hideously expensive, sanitary regulations to do with pipes made of metals of various kinds, or plastic, or metals again; various kinds of suction pump, various other arbitrary and always temporary regulations. The cost of compliance puts small farmers out of the business. The real killer for the small farmer, though, is requiring homogenized and pasteurized milk, which makes all milk taste remarkably similar. Happily for big corporations, there are lots of high-minded and well-intentioned ways to put the small guy out of your business. Personally, I would prefer it if the government did NOT have the power to dictate what kind of pipe milk is pumped through. Posted October 12, 2009 3:58 PM
Stephen Smith writes:
Factory farming is also encouraged by farm subsidies. (Essentially, farmers used to be able to use corn stalks, etc. to feed their pigs more cheaply than store-bought feed, but only up to a certain point...nowadays, with corn and soy subsidized, feed bought from the store is cheaper than using corn stalks and what-not, so farmers don't keep pigs anymore.) Bottom line is, factory farming is NOT a free market equilibrium. http://ase.tufts.edu/gdae/Pubs/wp/07-04LivingHighOnHog.pdf Posted October 13, 2009 1:56 PM
Comments for this entry
have been closed
|
||||||||
|
|
|
||||||||