ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


Cuba Libres are known to bar managers as "the fighting drink" because sugar, caffeine, and alcohol make for energetic drunks. Beer is more more nutritious (its carbs burn slower than pure sugar), which makes people less hungry and thus less cranky.
Your situation may be different, but I'm not inconvenienced by a ban on watermelon flavor Four Loko.
I'm a clinical pathologist, and toxicology is part of my specialty. I cannot come up with any possible medical reason to ban drinks containing ethanol and caffeine. Caffeine doesn't amplify any of ethanol's negative effects. And, caffeine isn't strong enough to counteract ethanol's negative effects (except it might help keep you alive if you mix barbiturates with ethanol). Therefore, the FDA must be acting on psychological issues: the belief that a man will drink more if he believes that caffeine will keep him more sober. I don't know if this belief is true, but it seems too nebulous to use as a justification for banning caffeine and alcohol drinks.
Ah, the nanny state at work! What in the world would we do if we didn't have the protection of the elites in the Bureaucracy?!
I just have to agree with C.S. Lewis's statement that "Of all tyrannies a tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive."