ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


The service of a huge debt poses two problems. A stock problem related to the debt accumulated to finance past deficits. And a flow problem related to future deficits. The question is whether you can solve the stock problem without solving first the flow problem. If you don't do it and solve first the stock problem, the cost of financing future deficits may increase sharply. This is true for private debtors but it's not clear that it applies to governments, especially in democracies.
In relation to the possibility of inflating the stock away, there is an important difference with the 1940s. Today the demand for currency is much lower and the inflation rate that you may need to do inflate the debt way may be much higher than in the 1940s.
There is more international trade today than in the late 1940s, a free floating exchange rate and more concern about currency valuations.
Similarly, there is a possibility that inflation as a means to lower our debt will push out the US dollar as international reserve currency and as the primary means for international payment.
If another currency becomes the standard international currency, inflation will not work to decrease our debt, the US might be forced to issue non-dollar denominated debt and the likelihood of a US default on its debt will increase.
I recall when interest rates fell during Clinton's era, Disney took advantage of it by issueing 50 year bonds (or were they 100 year bonds?). I'm kind of curious why the low rates and what appears to be a liquidity trap aren't today being meet with more governments like the US, UK and Europe rolling their debt over into 50 or 100 year bonds. Granted the market for these will not be as big as 30 year bonds, probably, but still it almost certainly exists.
Russ Roberts is correct about people under 40 not expecting a penny back - coming from someone who is 19.
If I was actually budgeting my life, I would choose a system that factored out social security and medicare for me for accuracy. Not only because I won't be receiving any social security, but because, given my major and anticipated lifespan as an early and heavy smoker, the likelihood is that I will overpay into the system even I expected to get anything back from it at all.
The fundamental obstacle to governments eroding their debt through inflation is the duration of the government debt portfolio. If all outstanding debt had ten years before it matured, then governments could inflate their way out of the debt burden. Inflation would ravage bond holders, and governments could create inflation with impunity, secure in the knowledge that existing bond holders could do nothing to punish them.