ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


Is there a particular reason why a charlatan and ideologue like Rand would appear on a blog putatively about "economics"?
Ignoring the intended slur, is there any particular reason an economist cannot make an imminently economic point using charlatans and ideologues as examples?
It should be no more difficult, really, than using a banal comment to make a point about logic...
Is there any particular reason that anyone would avoid a discussion about someone's economic views by simply labeling him/her as a charlatan and ideologue?
RL,
That was awesome.
Bob,
:-)
Very flattering, esp. as I'm an admirer of your work.