ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


Mainstream never scream from the rooftops that money is too lose now, they always scream that it USED to be too lose, and scream that it needs to be looser now.
I have seen and studied what ninety-six years of technocratic control does.It shows that markets alone are able to understand in real time all the knowledge neccasary to control the money supply.That is why freebanking must be seriously debated in this country.Anyone who believes in the Fed's ability to be the great and powerful Oz and then thinks himself capable of leading it has by nature an exaggerated view of their and it's ability
“Third, and most important, the Fed forecast for inflation was low relative to temporary blips in inflation.”
And we all know what great forecasters the Feds are! But this was Hayek’s chief insight on the Great D, about which Bernanke is supposed to be the reigning authority. Apparently he has never read Hayek. CPI inflation was very low during the 1920’s, which is the main reason the Feds pumped massive amounts of money into the economy. And just as happened in the recent crisis, the money went into assets such as manufacturing, stocks and housing. But the CPI remained low because of huge productivity increases.
Bernanke: “The lesson I take from this experience is not that financial regulation and supervision are ineffective for controlling emerging risks, but that their execution must be better and smarter.”
Never, under any circumstances, lose faith in bureaucrats, no matter how many times they fail. Of course, no one is clamoring to lynch the pols or regulators who wrote the “failed” regulations. Does anyone really believe that pols and regulators intentionally write stupid regulations that they know beforehand will fail? Of course not! Every regulation ever written is written by the smartest guys money can buy and they sell them by claming they will save us from another crisis. Yet, every time they fail. And as Kling has written before, government failure does nothing but create greater demand for more government regulation.
Kling: “Unfortunately, the process for selecting Federal Reserve Board leaders selects only people who have an exaggerated view of the ability of expert technocrats to guide the economy.”
Brilliant! So expect nothing but more of the same from these Keystone Cops!
If one cannot forecast well, at least one should have the humility to not act as if they know the future. This was what I (and some of my colleagues in a regional fed) was arguing, against the reduction of ff rate in 2003, as well as BB's promise of keeping it at 1% for "considerable time". BB was instrumental in getting that phrase into FOMC statements -- and it took them 3 or 4 meetings just to get rid of that phrase before they could actually raise the rate ...
As for the "mainstream macroeconomists", my impression is many of them didn't pay much attention to real time monetary policy, let alone "screaming", and on a rooftop!