ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


I have been at a seminar where a supervisor presented the results of work done by one of his students. But to be fair the seminar was in New Zealand and the student was in the US at the time, so couldn't present in person.
This is quite a find by Sumner.
"To be clear, it is most emphatically not good practice for monetary policymakers to try to target asset prices directly." - Bernanke, citing another paper by himself. I might have to go read that one too.
Does anyone know if Bernanke has given a defense of his change in perspective? Has anyone even challenged him on the apparent contradiction between his actions as Fed chairman and his academic work?
This is common practice. They're called "journal clubs". Of course, the context for those isn't the same as a regular seminar series. In that context, it would be rare. But "allowed"? Certainly. However, I would usually expect it only when some possibly groundbreaking paper has just been published, which people are eager to hear about from someone who has read it in detail.