ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


Aha! Too similar patterns around the same principle, both a new approach appearing right on Obama’s target. Maybe a double bull’s-eye with a bleed-heart libertarian bridge as well as a bleeding-heart liberal bridge. Since both balance compassion with personal responsibility combining the two might be a better bridge. See no contradiction and they complement with personal responsibility in moving towards a healthcare safety net.
Arnold and Nick make a excellent point about not really “health insurance” and “more like a pre-paid service plan with frequent small claims and high premiums”. Paying a “fair share” would help eliminate going to the doctor for minor ailments, which is a weakness of the Canadian system.
Still think the point of an incentive for preventing disease and encouraging health with a baseline-norm would be a major cost saver for the government and a major benefit for the people. Recall Obama also supporting the idea of preventive care and a way of applying it may resonate well with him.
In addition, the approach, one way or/and the other, is simple, easy to understand. Basic universal care would be back on the table. Obama can get personal with the people as a progressive statesman to explain the basic concepts with a few fireside chats – and bypass politicians and pundits, left and right.
Anyway, there’s definitely poetic justice in the air with two catchphrases: ‘A base-line norm for basic health care reform’ and ‘Pay fair share; get necessary care’.
What is also needed here in the US is something like the UK's National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) that studies the effectiveness of various treatments and relieves insurers of paying for ineffective treatments.
http://www.nice.org.uk/
Eh, I rather don't like it because I believe more people will go into the national catastrophic health insurance policy and for the ones who don't, their health savings accounts might not be sufficient because some of the increasing health care costs that one of these national insurance policies might bring for underpaying certain medical services services.