ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


I bet someone will accept the first bet offered in the comments of the Arnold's "A betting arena" post.
€ 5
Any takers? Its your opportunity...
Kurbla,
I accept your bet.
When do I get the money?
Good, Steve! But it appears we disagree who won, so we must find the judge. I propose Arnold, because this is his jurisdiction. If he doesn't want, the 2nd best is enlightened democracy, everyone is welcome to comment, but we count only people identifiable in the real world who already posted or commented here.
So, guys, help us: who won?
The silliest bet is that within ten years the large Hadron collider will destroy the earth. In that case, winning the bet won't mean anything.
There would be fewer suckers if more people were familiar with Pascal's Wager.
The problem with LongBets is that once a person has posted a prediction (which costs only $50), they have no obligation to accept any challenge bets. There are some standing predictions that are almost certainly wrong. (And yes, I *did* challenge someone...to no response.)