Few deals can guarantee to get everyone more of what they want, but by encouraging and enabling more better wider deals, the use of efficiency analysis sure seems to me to tend to get most everyone more of what they want. Isn't that good enough?

Here's the reply I posted in his comments:

It would have been sufficient if you said: "When I said 'everyone,' I meant 'most everyone.'" I'm not jumping on you for lack of disclaimers, but for stubborn overstatement.

Comments and Sharing

CATEGORIES: Cost-benefit Analysis

COMMENTS (1 to date)

Latest Comment

david writes:

I think both of you mean almost everyone? Or is this an Americanism?

Posted March 16, 2010 2:58 PM

Comments for this entry have been closed

Read comments

Return to top

Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures courtesy of the authors.
All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.

The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the earliest-known written appearance of the word "freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.

Contact Site Map Privacy and Legal http://www.econlib.org