Econlib Resources
Subscribe to EconLog
XML (Full articles)RDF (Excerpts) Feedburner (One-click subscriptions) Subscribe by author
Bryan CaplanDavid Henderson Arnold Kling More
FAQ
(Instructions and more options)
|
|
||||||||
|
|
Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures courtesy of the authors. All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.
The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the
earliest-known written appearance of the word
"freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It
is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.
|
||||||||
Shorter mortgages are better. Even so, I discovered that a fifteen year note was bundled and no longer in the bank when selling a house, before the housing crisis. Would shorter notes continue to be bundled and sold as before?
"It wouldn't take much of an increase in inflation and short-term interest rates before many banks/thrifts could see their interest margins squeezed"
Just maybe the primary objective of the Fed for the past couple of years is to keep inflation and short-term interest rates low at the expense of the economy.
IOW, maybe the Fed has deliberately kept the growth rate of nominal GDP low to keep short-term interests rates low.
30 years fixed rate mortgages are popping up all over Europe in places/cities where house prices have risen a lot in the last decade.
1. Is your worry that the risks of lending on 30-year low-fixed-interest terms are unhedged by our government and private holders, or that they are unhedgeable?
And what's the result if we move to 15-year products over the next few years, with either non-teaser fixed rates for some period or simple floating rates? Would that effectively stop new housing for a couple of years? Would many new homes be apartments instead of single-family units? Are you really saying that we need to shrink houses?
2. If our biggest expenses are housing, education, and old people health care, and if costs and/or risks of each have been taken on by the government whether through government guarantees, government issued loans, special legal status and/or tax treatment(home mortgage deduction, no discharge of education loans), or government payments, then how much have these subsidies warped Americans' consumption over the past 30 years (just since 1980, with Reagan)?
And how can we even imagine the neigborhoods we would live in, the cities that would not have boomed, the kids who would not have spent four years in third-tier liberal arts colleges, the aunts who wouldn't have government-paid Rascals to scoot around in?
Even going back just a few years, imagine if there had been some scandal at Fannie and Countrywide in 2003 that had served to inoculate us against the bigger problems to come.
As a Canadian I'd never even heard of a 30 year fixed rate mortgage until I started paying attention to the financial crisis. I have the - fairly typical in Canada - 5 year fixed rate mortgage with the payments determined on a 25 year amortization. Oh, sorry, currently I have a 4 year fixed rate because of a rate sale at the bank when I bought my place.
Anyhow, the Canadian housing market is doing quite well, and the local market has been hot since at least 2003. I can't say that that will continue; likely not.
Pierre
There are very few banks (in number) who portfolio mortgages any more, but from what I understand many of the TBTF banks still do.
Does anyone have insight into how they hedge this interest rate risk (along with FHLMC and FNMA)? If at all I suppose.
How exactly is a 30 year fixed mortgage different from a 30 year treasury bond?
OK, lots of ways, but they both pay a fixed rate of interest for 30 years, right? And one is an evil bank killer and the other is ok? Huh?
[Comment edited for crude language.--Econlib Ed.]
I'm not that experienced, but in South Africa where I was into doing bonds for a year, variable rate residential mortgages are the norm. In rare cases clients applied for an up to five years fixed interest rate (which could be acquired at a premium).
I was really struck by it when I first heard of how common 30 year fixed rates are in the US.
Part of the popularity of 30-fixed is because housing is grossly overpriced relative to income. Housing would have to drop by another 50% or more to bring asset prices close enough to incomes to be able to pay off a home in 5 to 15 years, and to allow people to save enough money to get a large enough down payment to be able to get a short-term loan.
I'm always curious to see where these rates go. I'm not that close to buying a house yet (just out of college) but I hope something changes in the future for mortgages to be more stable. I've always been looking around at rates for different kinds of mortgages like Nationwide Bank's loan rates or something like Bankrate. I'll continue to keep looking at these rates the closer and closer I get to purchasing a house; I'm crossing my fingers it doesn't become too difficult to sustain a mortgage.
Actually, we could assume that the bank lends at floating and then allows the borrower to swap into fixed. The prepayment option is a call. The borrower is long a call on his mortgage and he's long a put on his house (in the event of default followed by foreclosure). I assume that all of these are priced in or could be priced in. It would seem, however, that mortgage lenders and investors neglected to hedge their exposure to their short position in house puts.