ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


More likely you have a worldview that only works for the fortunate.
Another positive psychology tenant bites the dust. How lame.
"Another positive psychology tenant bites the dust"
Not just them either. It's in Adam Smith's Theory of Moral Sentiments. Someone who loses a leg will put himself in the minds of others, who will feel some sadness or pity or compassion but not lose lots of sleep over his lost leg. Sympathizing with these sentiments of others is supposed to give him a wake-up call and make him Stoically take it like a man.
It's not always clear whether he's being 100% serious in his empirical claims like that, or is just using them to teach the reader how he should respond to adversity.