ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


The origin of the term "union label" may have been its use as a national origin label, but that does not mean that the terms "union label" and "national origin label" share the same origin. You are equivocating the "national origin label" from the Encyclopedia with the "national origin label from Brian's post--the latter is de jure, the former is merely de facto. Their meanings are distinct.
This is a classic example of the logical fallacy of shifting meanings. I wouldn't be surprised to see it used in a question on the LSAT in a few years.
China. Lead based paint on children's toys; contaminated dog food etc. It's a useful indicator of quality - possibly more useful than traditional branding given the disconnect between the brand name and the actual manufacturers.