ARNOLD KLING
December 12, 2011
Two Papers on PSST
December 12, 2011
Inside the New Poverty Measure
December 11, 2011
Cheeseburgers Require PSST
December 10, 2011
More on the Anti-Commons
December 10, 2011
Khan!
BRYAN CAPLAN
December 12, 2011
The "Virtue" of Low Academic Standards
December 9, 2011
The Julian Simon Club
December 8, 2011
Advantage, Sociology: Gender and the Return to Education
December 8, 2011
"Socialists Won Over By War"
December 7, 2011
A Cursory Rejection of Anti-Natalism
DAVID HENDERSON
December 13, 2011
Donald Trump: The Price is Wrong
December 11, 2011
NYT's Jeff Sommer's Shoddy Reporting
December 10, 2011
Some Motives Revealed
December 9, 2011
The Risks of Kidney Donation
December 8, 2011
John Cochrane's Talk at Hoover: His Version


Mr. Diamond's credentials appear to be all academic. I do not know him personally, but just the thought of more academics in decision making roles seems like a bad idea.
Theorists are somehow unable to perform "fact-based reasoning?"
If you define theorists as people who can build models, then Narayana Kocherlakota is a theorist. Eric Rosengren is also a theorist by that definition. Regardless of what you want to see the Fed do, the ability to do theory does not exclude people from making reasonable judgements in any subjective opinion, since theorists are on both sides of the debate.
The delays on Diamond's confirmation are unconscionable; I don't think there is a single more qualified person to be appointed to the Board. He practically invented one of the two major approaches to the way we think about macroeconomic growth, he's the foremost expert in Social Security issues, and he wrote the seminal paper on the Beveridge curve, not to mention an extensive set of publications on inflation and monetary policy. If Peter Diamond's not qualified, nobody's qualified.