![]() Econlib Resources
Subscribe to EconLog
XML (Full articles)RDF (Excerpts) Feedburner (One-click subscriptions) Subscribe by author
Bryan CaplanDavid Henderson Alberto Mingardi Scott Sumner Subscribe by email
More
FAQ
(Instructions and more options)
|
|
||||||||
![]() |
![]() |
Coase theorem suggests that the problem isn't that borrowers own the home or that lenders own the home, but rather that we don't know who exactly owns the home.
Property rights in being in limbo is very very very bad.
It's probably less. Borrowers who spend more time in the foreclosure process will be overrepresented in a static count. For example, the borrower who stays in his house for a year after his last payment is twice as likely to be counted as the borrower who stays for six months.
These were clever people if that was their plan all along. In which case, the phrase predatory borrowing would be appropriate.
Steve
yep. it's predatory borrowing followed by predatory unemployment followed by predatory health problems; lock em all up!
The rational thing to do seems to be to mostly save money by not paying the mortgage, but occasionally write sad sob-story apologies, with some small $100-$300 payment as an "attempt" to "pay what you can", to avoid the process starting.
In the meantime, save the mortgage to become a downpayment on the next house, when the market has clearly bottomed out; but wait until they take the keys to move into a low cost rental (where you can save more effectively).
I'd call it rational borrowing.