ARNOLD KLING
August 14, 2011
The Top Political Contributors
August 11, 2011
Gender and the New Commanding Heights
August 11, 2011
Jamie Galbraith Makes an Assumption
August 11, 2011
Macroeconometrics: The Science of Hubris
August 10, 2011
Real and Nominal Bond Yields
BRYAN CAPLAN
August 14, 2011
The Effect of Thumb Sucking on Income
August 12, 2011
The Voice of Cold, Hard Truth to All Would-Be Educators
August 12, 2011
Ability, Morality, and Prosperity: A Paper and a Report
August 11, 2011
The Theory of Time and Frittering
August 10, 2011
Male Variance and the Remnants of the Gender Gap
DAVID HENDERSON
August 9, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken", Part Two
August 8, 2011
Hayek in "Unbroken"
August 5, 2011
James Bovard on the Peace Corps
August 4, 2011
Summers Way Off on FDR and 1941
August 3, 2011
The "Amazon" Tax


I double-dog dare you to name the (major) religious texts that have been proved historically wrong and how.
Besides the Book of Mormon.
(I'll admit to not having read your book. so if your link to it was meant to answer this point...)
Mr. Elmore,
Much of the Old Testament account in Exodus has been proven false simply because there is no possible way for the timelines to match up with the archaeology. Worse still, the Jews don't seem to have invaded Canaan but are just a branch of the same group.
The New Testament suffers from a lack of textual, archaeological or epigraphic evidence to affirm it and the most solid position is that it is mostly or entirely mythic.
That puts three religious groups out in the cold.
Religious texts are much more rarely and more recently debunked because the history of religious archaeology as a science rather than apologia is short.