Search EconLog

Mao's Great Famine and Depraved Indifference

Home
| EconLog
| Archives
| Permanent Link and Comments

In Mao's Great Famine, Frank Dikötter joins the elite club of historians who live up to their duty to impose "the undying penalty which history has the power to inflict on wrong." On purely literary terms I still prefer Jasper Becker's Hungry Ghosts, but Dikötter's archival work on the Great Leap Forward is unsurpassed. His bottom line: The standard horrific body count of 20-30 million deaths from starvation is grossly understated. The true death toll is much higher - and open violence was an important secondary cause of death:

[A]t least 45 million people perished above a normal death rate during the famine from 1958 to 1962... [I]t is likely that at least 2.5 million of these victims were beaten or tortured to death.

One highlight:

Obsfucation was the communist way of life. People lied to survive, and as a consequence information was distorted all the way up to the Chairman. The planned economy required huge inputs of accurate data, yet at every level targets were distorted, figures were inflated and policies which clashed with local interests were ignored. As with the profit motive, individual initiative and critical thought had to be constantly suppressed, and a permanent state of siege developed.

But how can we convict Mao of mass murder if he was caught in a web of his subordinates' lies? The answer is simple: Mao's explicit policy of "kill the messenger (after calling him a 'rightist')" makes the whole tragedy an open-and-shut case of what lawyers call depraved indifference murder:

To constitute depraved indifference, the defendant's conduct must be so wanton, so deficient in a moral sense of concern, so lacking in regard for the life or lives of others, and so blameworthy as to warrant the same criminal liability as that which the law imposes upon a person who intentionally causes a crime.

If I were prosecuting Mao, I'd further cover my bases by pointing out that he gave explicit orders to literally enslave hundreds of millions, then invoke the felony murder rule. However you slice it, Mao was a monster - and it's high time for China to tear down his remaining posters and replace them with monuments to his victims.

Comments and Sharing

CATEGORIES: Economic History , Economic Philosophy
Follow Bryan Caplan on Twitter

COMMENTS (4 to date)

Latest Comment

squigglers writes:

[Comment removed for supplying throwaway email address. Email the webmaster@econlib.org to request restoring this comment. A valid email address is required to post comments on EconLog.--Econlib Ed.]

Posted February 13, 2011 2:08 AM

Steve Roth writes:

Tangential, but...

>information was distorted all the way up to the Chairman. The planned economy required huge inputs of accurate data, yet at every level targets were distorted, figures were inflated and policies which clashed with local interests were ignored. As with the profit motive, individual initiative and critical thought had to be constantly suppressed, and a permanent state of siege developed.

Reading that, I thought of one thing: McNamara and Vietnam.

Posted February 13, 2011 11:35 AM

Patrick R. Sullivan writes:

It's also long overdue that we give credit to the anti-communists here who tried to bring the Americans to account who enabled Mao in the 1940s. The Sol Adler, Frank Coe, John Stewart Service types who were sending dispatches from Chunking bad mouthing Chiang Kai Shek and promoting Mao as the true democrat in China.

Chief among whom was Sen. Joe McCarthy.

Posted February 13, 2011 3:00 PM

Jesse writes:

Fascinating discussion. Frank discusses The History of China's Most Devastating Catastrophe via interview at the Asia Society in New York.

Posted February 15, 2011 5:46 PM

Comments for this entry have been closed

Read comments

Return to top

Blogging software: Powered by Movable Type 4.2.1.
Pictures courtesy of the authors.
All opinions expressed on EconLog reflect those of the author or individual commenters, and do not necessarily represent the views or positions of the Library of Economics and Liberty (Econlib) website or its owner, Liberty Fund, Inc.

The cuneiform inscription in the Liberty Fund logo is the earliest-known written appearance of the word "freedom" (amagi), or "liberty." It is taken from a clay document written about 2300 B.C. in the Sumerian city-state of Lagash.

Contact Site Map Privacy and Legal http://www.econlib.org